1 Disar

The Last Emperor Movie Essay

The Last Emperor Puyi Essay

On 15th November 1908, on her deathbed the Dowager Empress named young Aisin Gioro Puyi to inherit to the throne. The son of the imprisoned emperor's brother, Puyi was only three years old at the time. Foreigners were over powering China; Qing dynasty (1) seemed to have reached its end. Puyi was sent to live in the Forbidden City, Zijincheng (2), now known as Tiananmen Square. At the palace, Puyi was able to receive everything he wanted. The young emperor was being treated with great respect. However, Puyi was kept like a prisoner, he had absolutely no freedom. In 1911 a rebellion was held forcing Prince Ch'un (Puyi) to resign as a regent. Yuan Shih-k'ai took over the control of Chinese government, he wanted to be the ruler of the dynasty and also abdicate Puyi. The Manchu Grand Council agreed, they had no as they had no other choice. Their power wasn't as strong as before and didn't have a decent ruler (Puyi was still very young to make any grand decisions). On 12th February 1912, the five-year old emperor renounced his throne. In 1917, a warlord named Chang Hsun a Manchurian decided to help to restore Puyi to the throne. His army surrounded Beijing; Puyi was renounce as the emperor again. However only six days later, Puyi 's restoration, three bombs were being dropped on the Forbidden City. Puyi 's supporters abandoned him, which meant once again he lost his throne. The British Colonial Office Reginald Johnston became Puyi's English tutor. The emperor was strongly influenced by Johnston. He had an attraction to Western things. In 1924 Feng Yu-hsiang ordered his army to surround the Forbidden City. He was both a Communist and a Christian and was an enemy of the Manchus. Prince Ch'un was forced to leave the Forbidden City. This meant Puyi regained his freedom and will be treated as an ordinary citizen. A quote he spoke was. "I had no freedom as emperor. Now I want to have the I have found my freedom!"(3) He moved into a Japanese compound and was later joined by his wives and staff. Soon they moved to Tientsin, the coast of China. The Japanese had a lot of power there. Chang Garden was Puyi's working and living place. He spent many year there trying to plot to regain his throne. In 1928, revolutionaries looted the tombs of some of P'u Yi's ancestors, including Dowager Empress Tzu Hsi. Puyi hated the Chinese because of this. In 1931 the Japanese army invaded Manchuria, the Japanese helped to build a new empire called Manchuguo, they made Puyi the emperor however, he was only used as a puppet. The Japanese were the once making the decision from the back. Japanese ordered spies to watch over Puyi. Chinese governments believed Manchuguo as a fake country. Only the German, Italians and Japanese recognize the existence of Manchugou. Why did Puyi have such a bad reputation among the Chinese and many...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Reasons for the Downfall of the Manchu Government in 1911

672 words - 3 pages The Manchu government’s refusal to open up China to trade with the western powers led to armed invasions by the foreign powers. China did not want any goods from the west as China considered itself as self-sufficient. China regarded trade as a favour China granted to the less fortunate nations. However Britain was very much interested in purchasing Chinese silks, porcelain goods and Chinese tea. Therefore, Britain found a new commodity and this...

Wallace Stevens's The Emperor of Ice-Cream

955 words - 4 pages Wallace Stevens's "The Emperor of Ice-Cream" "The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream," Wallace Steven's writes in his poem "The Emperor of Ice-Cream" (8). This line proclaiming the ice-cream maker as important as an emperor is used metaphorically to describe the selfishness of human nature. One the surface, the poem is about the wake of a poor, old woman. However, if the metaphors and symbols of the poem are examined, the poem's deeper...

To what extent did the Japanese threat have an impact on the outcome of the power struggle between the Communists and the Kuomintang?

1158 words - 5 pages Every action has a reason, and Japan's reason for the invasion of China was purely land, in quality and quantity. Manchuria or as it was later renamed by the Japanese Manzhouguo proved to be an excellent source for forestry, minerals, and agricultural products in...

Factors Contributed that to the Formation of Eunuch Culture in Ming Dynasty

1622 words - 6 pages Eunuchs, a group of castrated people served in the palace, were initially hired to take care of the personal life of the emperors. However, because of their accessibility to the rulers, they sometimes could be so powerful that can control the government. Shi, Yi, a historian in Qing Dynasty, had ever said that”There were three periods in Chinese History, in which eunuchs actually took control of the country. Among those three periods, Ming...

The imperial woman

1289 words - 5 pages In 1852, a Manchurian girl, Orchid, clan name Yehonala, was summoned to be viewed by the Emperor of China. On the twentieth day of the sixth moon, the last Empress of China was chosen. By right, her cousin, Sakota, was the Emperor's consort, but she gave birth to a girl. Yehonala gave birth to a boy and became the Empress, Tzu Hsi. Once the Son of...

How Successful Was Chiang Kaishek As Ruler of China From 1927-37?

1531 words - 6 pages Alan StewardHow Successful Was Chiang Kaishek As Ruler of China From 1927-37?Chiang Kaishek was a leader who had high hopes for China. He is believed to have genuinely wanted to make a difference; with his main aim being to end warlordism and unite China. He was unfortunately unsuccessful in the majority of his efforts to...

Septimius Severus

1755 words - 7 pages There are many Roman emperors and there are a few that people see as experiencing success. In a recent survey by worldaffairsboard.com Augustus, Marcus Aurelius and Trajan were voted as the best. Septimius Severus who was also a great emperor was not even on the list. There are many things that go into making a good emperor such as military strength, taxes and life of the people in Rome. Septimius Severus was a great emperor because he had many...

The Meiji Restoration.

1548 words - 6 pages (a)Describe the modernisation of Japan:The Meiji Restoration describes a period of events which led to a dramatic change in the political and social structure of Japan following the downfall of the Tokugawa period. This period, called the Meiji period, lasted for 4 years (1866-1869), changing the traditional political system and revolutionizing Japan in a global context with Emperor Meiji reigning. Through this modernisation, Japan...

The History of the First Emperor of China

1585 words - 6 pages On March 29, 1974, a couple of workers were digging a water well on the east side of Mount Li outside of the city of Xi’an. The workers uncovered a single terracotta figure and called the government authorities who investigated the matter. Soon, government archeologists were sent to the site. The unearthed great clay army that has baffled modern day craftsmen, intrigued archeologists, and amazed the general public. Before this discovery, no one...

The Political Importance of Zheng He’s Voyages

1031 words - 4 pages Accompanied by 27,000 men on 62 large and 255 small ships, the Chinese eunuch Zheng He, led 7 naval expeditions to Southeast Asia, Middle East and east coast of Africa in the span of 28 years during the Ming Dynasty. The scale of Zheng He’s fleet was unprecedented in world history. The large treasure ships used during the expeditions were purported to be 440 feet long and 180 feet wide (Dreyer, p. 102). Throughout his travels, Zheng He brought...

Empress Lü: Power-Hungry or Protective?

2459 words - 10 pages No other woman in the Early Han held the same amount of influence as Empress Lü throughout her various titles as Empress, Empress Dowager, and then Grand Empress Dowager. Stories recounting her manipulative nature paint a picture of a scheming empress using her imperial power to bestow favors and political positions to her own clan. This essay argues that Empress Lü used the lack of precedence for her position as Empress Dowager to manipulate...

Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Last Emperor (1987) chronicles the story of a man unable to break out of his destiny. The Chinese Emperor Pu Yi (played as an adult by John Lone) receives the throne as a child. “The son of heaven,” he is the most powerful person in the whole nation. He spends his life incarcerated in the Forbidden City, with his behavior controlled by the protocols of his seat. This is a man of tremendous means, but so closely guarded that he is expected to be divine, while not permitted to be human. This is a profound film about the ways political change affects an uncommon man.

It is 1950. Mao Zedong has transformed China from an Imperial state into a communist nation. The bright world of gold and red has succumbed to a drab military green. In prison, Pu Yi is up for trial as a war criminal—and it is here that he tells his story.

Eunuchs train him to be an emperor while he tries to be a child. As a tween, he grows frustrated by the confines of the palace. As a teenager, he marries. As a man, he tries to reform the nation. Through it all, the nation outside his home witnesses a revolution in the midst of war. After recent wars with the Japanese, the Communists rule. Now, as a remolded prisoner, he confesses to countless crimes. He completes his life in a greenhouse, trimming plants and flowers.

Bertolucci’s narratives often seamlessly fit two very different stories together, usually told through two separate characters, as though two lives are intersecting. Most films tend to follow the same plot through separate characters. In Last Tango in Paris, however, we watch the story of a man breaking down emotionally and psychologically, while a woman gets abused in all her social circles.  In The Sheltering Sky, one woman seeks something ethereal, while her husband seeks to reunite with her.

This film’s storyline follows the same idea, except that the “characters” are the same person: Pu Yi the emperor and Pu Yi the prisoner. The story shifts back and forth between two periods at parallel moments: He is in prison getting educated according of the narrative of the new China; he thinks back to his classes as a yawning child in the Forbidden City, while the new China forms outside. In the latter, his teachers form him, while in the latter his wardens reform him. His confinement is what binds both these periods together.

Both old and new political orders exude remarkable optimism. In the imperial classroom, Pu Yi learns that human nature is inherently good; the same worldview is taught in prison. Both societies drive themselves through utopian visions. But it is no coincidence that Bertolucci’s film came at the end of the 1980s, when China was on the brink of another change: free markets replacing the communist infrastructure. Thus, the 20th century had three Chinas: imperial, communist, and capitalist.

It is in the midst of this third China that we meet the odd voice of Pu Yi’s liberation. Reginald Johnston (Peter O’Toole) arrives from the United Kingdom to tutor him by exposing him to the social, cultural, and political norms of the West. Immediately, the conversation seems like the meeting of a man of the world exposing a naive little boy to the ways of life. On a deeper level, though, these conversations illustrate fundamental differences between the three worlds, at least as Bertolucci perceives them. The imperial world elevates an individual to the metaphorical heavens, dresses him in layers of shiny ornamentation and guards him with layers of protection.  Such layers, however, separate him from the masses. Though the communist world removes all the pomp, the individual—with the exception of the Chairman, of course, especially after the Cultural Revolution—remains stifled for the sake of the collective.

The capitalist, however, elevates all individuals, and defeats the empire in war. It brings innovation: bicycles and glasses. It also brings a level of ornamentation, which seems subdued compared to what was seen during imperial times. More than that, it brings ethics, compassion, and pragmatism. By comparison, the imperial world seems foolish and the communist world brutally regulated. It wins over Pu Yi through free culture: pianos, tennis, and chewing gum.

Peter O’Toole’s casting in the role as the voice of the capitalist is no coincidence. His role in The Last Emperor—bringing a better world to the apparently hyper-civilized Chinese—is similar to the one he famously played in Lawrence of Arabia (1962), attempting to bring civility to the apparently thuggish Arabs. He is cinema’s great White Savior. And, as is commonly the case with nationalist films, another nation gets vilified. The film clearly loves China, with Bertolucci seemingly fascinated by its cultural riches. In such an exalted context, however, Japanese imperialists unfortunately come off like common, frowning criminals in uniforms, recalling their racist portrayal in many of Hollywood’s World War II films.

Nevertheless, The Last Emperor remains one of the great cinematic epics. Vittorio Storaro’s typically exquisite cinematography deliciously explores the various colors and shades of each of the phases. In addition, Wang Chunpu’s and Ferdinando Scarfiotti’s set design, combined with Maria Teresa Barbasso’s costumes, provide a feast for the eyes rarely seen in Western films.

Amid the ravishing spectacle, Jone Lone’s acting style seems fascinatingly subdued. From start to finish, all the actors playing Pu Yi (Richard Vuu, Tijger Tsou, Wu Tao) present him as simply human, far less complicated than the world around him. By the end of his life, he appears to finally find his bliss neither in the pageantry of his childhood nor in black tuxedos, but as an anonymous gardener. In the final scene of The Last Emperor—one of the great closing scenes of cinema—Pu Yi walks alone through the empty Forbidden City, which is now a museum. As a young scout meets the elder Pu Yi at his old throne, he shares with us something that nobody in his lifetime could understand: a nostalgia for a home that in its day was his locked penitentiary. The great emperor, once seen as the voice of divinity, is now—in line with almost all of history’s pharaohs and kings—all but forgotten. His furniture is now the stuff of museum artifacts, which museum spectators now marvel at, not caring about his personal frustrations. Except for this film, and a few biographies, even in death he is a man who is paradoxically elevated yet ignored.


This essay is in light of the Bernardo Bertolucci’s retrospective at the Castro Theater this Saturday, October 18th. Buy tickets here.

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *